Segment
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Laufenn (31%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 61% compared to 3% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the i*Fit + LW31 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
