Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Lowcost
Comparison: GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK520
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than GT (51%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 22% of the GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2023 255/45 R20 test, where both the radial Sport Active 2 SUV and the Azenis FK520 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the radial Sport Active 2 SUV is made in China and Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey.
| # | GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet side guide
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
