Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than GT (51%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 87% compared to 22% of the GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV. The first tyre test of GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2023 255/45 R20 test, where both the radial Sport Active 2 SUV and the Potenza Sport were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the radial Sport Active 2 SUV is made in China and Potenza Sport is made in Poland/Hungary.
| # | GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Sufficient
2. GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT radial Sport Active 2 SUV Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||