Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Riken Road Performance
| Maxxis Mecotra 3
| Toyo Proxes CF2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R16 | R13 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.53. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Wet braking
3. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
4. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet handling
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Wet circle cornering
1. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
3. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
