Segment
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost2. Riken Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken). But when it comes to comparing Gt Radial Fe2 and Riken Road Performance , the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Gt Radial Fe2 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Riken Road Performance first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Fe2 and the Road Performance were tested.
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Riken Road Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Wet braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
