Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Vredestein Quatrac

GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Vredestein Quatrac — a direct comparison of two all-round tyres based on our test program and multiple AUTOBILD test results. This side-by-side looks at recorded scores, test positions, strengths and weaknesses, and practical buying guidance.

Quick summary: The Vredestein Quatrac leads overall with a clear performance edge — our rating: 92% vs GT RADIAL ClimateActive at 83%. In head-to-head AUTOBILD runs the Quatrac consistently ranks higher (1st in an 11-tyre test; 5th in a 37-tyre test) while the GT RADIAL sits mid-pack (5th in the 11-tyre test, 8th in the 37-tyre test).

Where Vredestein Quatrac shines

• Wet and snow performance: Repeated test highlights include excellent wet handling, wet braking and snow braking. AUTOBILD notes short wet braking and strong aquaplaning reserves — the Quatrac was often first for safety-related measures.


• Low exterior noise & balanced handling: Tests credit the tyre for quiet operation and a direct, sporty steering feel while remaining composed on all surfaces.


• Versatility: Described as an “allround talent” — balanced and safe across dry, wet and snowy conditions.


• Trade-off: Slightly increased rolling resistance in some tests and occasionally marginally longer dry braking compared with the very top ultra-high-performance tyres.

Where GT RADIAL ClimateActive performs

• Value for money: Referred to as a “Preisknaller” (price performer) — strong on price with no severe weaknesses in everyday driving.


• Snow braking & low noise: Tests repeatedly flag good snow braking and low exterior noise.


• Safe handling on wet and dry: AUTOBILD reports convincing handling and short braking distances on snowy surfaces; generally secure manners on wet and dry roads.


• Trade-offs: Quiet but with somewhat longer wet and dry braking distances in some tests and a noted limitation in expected tread life (reduced mileage compared with premium competitors).

Test comparison & mutual positions
Across the AUTOBILD tests included in our dataset the Quatrac outperforms the ClimateActive. Example: in an 11-tyre AUTOBILD test the Quatrac finished 1st while the ClimateActive was 5th. In a larger 37-tyre benchmark the Quatrac placed 5th and the ClimateActive 8th. These positions reflect Vredestein’s superior wet/snow braking, aquaplaning resistance and overall safety margins.

Verdict — which to choose?

• Choose the Vredestein Quatrac if you prioritise performance and safety across wet and snowy conditions, low noise and an all-round premium driving feel. It is the better performer in our test battery and scores highest overall (92%). View tyre details — Vredestein manufacturer.


• Choose the GT RADIAL ClimateActive if budget and solid, safe everyday performance matter more than shaving tenths in braking tests. It offers very good snow braking and low noise for a lower price, but expect slightly longer braking distances in some wet/dry scenarios and somewhat reduced longevity. View tyre details — GT RADIAL manufacturer.

Replacement note: Neither model in our dataset is listed as replaced by a newer generation. If a successor model appears, we will link to the newer tyre from these pages.

Overall: Vredestein Quatrac is the stronger all-round performer and best choice for drivers seeking top wet and winter safety; GT RADIAL ClimateActive is an attractive, value-focused option with respectable performance but clear compromises in braking distances and tread life.