Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Viking FourTech Plus
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Viking (56%). In this particular case, the GT RADIAL ClimateActive has a better rating of 83% compared to 56% of the Viking FourTech Plus. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the RADIAL ClimateActive and the FourTech Plus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 2 tests
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
Viking FourTech Plus
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
