Segment
2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Continental (73%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a better rating of 88% compared to 83% of the GT RADIAL ClimateActive. The first tyre test of GT RADIAL ClimateActive was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the RADIAL ClimateActive and the AllSeasonContact 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT RADIAL ClimateActive
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial ClimateActive Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| GT Radial ClimateActive | 40.9 | 56.6 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||