Segment
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Nexen (34%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro WinterPro and Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the GTÜ 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro and the Winguard Snow G WH2 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R13 - R13 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Still recommended
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Conditionally recommended | 305 | 95 | 108 | 102 | 14 | 10 | |
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Recommended | 341 | 86 | 119 | 136 | 20 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||