Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than GT (50%). The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP and the WR SUV 4 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Test winner | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||