Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. GT Radial 4Seasons Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Continental (73%). The first tyre test of GT Radial 4Seasons was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the Radial 4Seasons and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial 4Seasons
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. GT Radial 4Seasons Lowcost
2. GT Radial 4Seasons 25.67
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| GT Radial 4Seasons | 49,3 | 51,3 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| GT Radial 4Seasons | 45,3 | 58,2 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| GT Radial 4Seasons | 46,5 | 60,3 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,6 | 49,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||