Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport vs. Falken Azenis FK520
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Gripmax) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Gripmax (30%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 19% of the Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport. The first tyre test of Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the SureGrip Pro Sport and the Azenis FK520 were tested.
| # | Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R24 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport | 36.8 | 33.2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 35.3 | 27.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
