Segment
1. Falken Azenis RS820 Upper-middle2. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport vs. Falken Azenis RS820
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Gripmax) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Gripmax (30%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis RS820 has a better rating of 57% compared to 40% of the Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport. The first tyre test of Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport was done in 2023, compared to 2025 when was the Falken Azenis RS820 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the SuperGrip Pro Sport and the Azenis RS820 were tested.
| # | Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport
| Falken Azenis RS820
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory2. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory2. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Falken Azenis RS820 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
