Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 88% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3. The first tyre test of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV also have B wet ratings.
# | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |