• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 88% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3. The first tyre test of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV also have B wet ratings.

# GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
/88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
/94%

Add to comparison

GoodYear
Michelin
DimensionsR19 - R19 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
Rating: Exemplary
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Rating: Test winner
Show test details