Comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 — test comparison

This side-by-side compares two popular all-season tyres: the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. Neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model (no successor linked), so the reviews and test results below reflect current variants on the market. Manufacturer pages: Goodyear and Hankook.

Summary of test results and ranking

Strengths and weaknesses — Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

• Strengths: Repeated praise for excellent wet handling, strong snow braking and traction, high predicted mileage and low rolling resistance. Test reports highlight very good aquaplaning resistance in several trials and a comfortable ride.


• Weaknesses: Consistent notes about slightly extended dry braking distances and marginally higher road noise in some reports. Our site rating: 81%.


• Best for drivers who prioritise winter balance, wet safety and tyre economy (fuel and mileage).

Strengths and weaknesses — Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

• Strengths: Exceptional dry handling and short braking distances in many tests, very good wet braking in several independent reviews, low rolling resistance and generally high comfort. Our site rating: 89%.


• Weaknesses: Mixed notes on aquaplaning and winter ability — some tests praise aquaplaning resistance, others report vulnerabilities; a few reports indicate slightly higher exterior noise or only average snow performance. Some tests flagged moderate wear characteristics in older editions.


• Best for drivers who want sharp dry performance and responsive handling with strong overall economy.

Head-to-head verdict

Recommendation: choose Hankook if you prioritise sporting handling and short braking distances in mixed conditions; choose Goodyear if you prioritise all‑around wet/snow balance and long tyre life. For full test details see the tyre pages: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750.