Segment
1. Goodyear UltraGrip SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear UltraGrip SUV vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear UltraGrip SUV and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2015 245/65 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip SUV and the WR SUV 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Goodyear UltraGrip SUV dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Goodyear UltraGrip SUV
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip SUV | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 | 2+ | 1- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
