Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv was done in 2023, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv Exemplary2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Ultragrip Performance+ Suv Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
