Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 255/55 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the WR SUV 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: - | 1 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||