Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Bridgestone (87%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo has C rating.
| # | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Recommended | 9,7 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 8,0 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||