In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Matador (47%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 93% compared to 47% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the MP93 Nordicca were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2022 | 215/60 R16 | View |
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Matador MP93 Nordicca
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.