18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /90%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%	Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R14 - R22	R17 - R21	R15 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 116

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 100

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 15x

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 7x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 2.

5. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 5.

2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 6.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

5. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2.67

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 3.57

5. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 2019

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 2018

Best rating in test

1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Highly recommended

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

5. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 Recommended

3. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

88.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

82%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81.3%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 83%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 70%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

90.2%

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

89.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

84%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 100%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

85.4%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80.9%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 60%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 70%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 60%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 50%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 60%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 B

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

83.4%

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

80.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

50%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 50%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 65%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 C

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

95%

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

86.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

74.3%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 100%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 0%

5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 70 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

5. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Michelin
Pilot Alpin PA4

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 21 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2.4	2.3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,1	2,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	1,4	2,2	2,0	2,8	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 235/55 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	1-	2	1	1	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2+	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	2,2	2,5	3,0	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

TÜV Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance
Best values in test	1102	301,21	501,21	202,4	109,6
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	1083	299,7	493,1	195	95,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	1097	300,69	497,39	196,8	102,4
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	98,1	298,5	282,5	93,7	87,5	99,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	34,4	24,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 235/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,5	1,9	1,8	2,3	2,6	0,8	1,8
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,9	1,5	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,5	3,0	2,2	2,4	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	8,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good	8,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8
Hankook Winter icept evo2 W320 Rating: Good*	7,6
Show test details