Segment
2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| # | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R17 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory3. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry performance
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | 1.7 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
