18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Apollo Aspire XP Winter

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /49%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R21	R16 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 24

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 1.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 30.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 13.63

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2025

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

69%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

68.9%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 59%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 59%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -18%

Snow braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 63%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -1%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 76%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Snow cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

67%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

66.2%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

64%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 47%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -57%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 63%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 58%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -1%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 61%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 59%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -39%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 76%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 75%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

65%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

59%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

52%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 44%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 34%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -123%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 70%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

76.3%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

61%

Exterior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 55%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

66%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

65.6%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

63%

Rolling resistance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 0%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 43%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 38%

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter -118%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

0%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	1.7
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	1.7
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2.3
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Poor	2.7
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 235/35 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1-
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2-	2-	1	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	2.0	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.9	1.6	1.3
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	1.7	2.1	2.2	2.1	3.2	1.8	1.7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.6	1.9	2.0	2.3	2.9	1.7	2.0
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	2.0	2.2	2.0	2.3	3.2	1.7	2.0
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.7	2.3	2.8	2.5	3.1	2.2	2.3
Show test details