12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 61%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 89%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 90%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 71%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 69%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

71%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2025 225/45 R17

Name
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Test winner
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.6	1.9	2.0	2.3	2.9	1.7	2.0
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	2.0	2.2	2.0	2.3	3.2	1.7	2.0
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	1.6	1.9	2.0	2.3	2.9	1.8	2.1
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	36.9	29.4
Continental WinterContact TS 870	37.1	29.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Recommended
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Test winner
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands