18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Goodyear UltraGrip 9 /0%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R13 - R20	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Nokian WR D4 82

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 41

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR D4 26x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 17x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 1.

2. Nokian WR D4 2.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 9.

2. Nokian WR D4 14.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 3.65

2. Nokian WR D4 6.04

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 2020

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

4. Nokian WR D4 2018

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended

2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

84%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

81%

Nokian
WR D4

78%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

2. Nokian WR D4 80%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 77%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

Dry driving behavior

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 76%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry performance

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 79%

3. Nokian WR D4 75%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Nokian WR D4 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Wet braking

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

3. Nokian WR D4 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 60%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 90%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

4. Nokian WR D4 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Nokian WR D4 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 90%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Nokian WR D4 76%

Wet circle cornering

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 73%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet performance

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

3. Nokian WR D4 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 C

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

92%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

77%

Snow traction

1. Nokian WR D4 92%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

Snow handling

1. Nokian WR D4 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 69%

Snow braking

1. Nokian WR D4 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 86%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 82%

Snow performance

1. Nokian WR D4 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 72%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow cornering

1. Nokian WR D4 94%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 84%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

77%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

75%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

70%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 72%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

4. Nokian WR D4 71%

Interior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 70%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 70%

3. Nokian WR D4 66%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Comfort

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Nokian WR D4 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

4. Nokian WR D4 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

74%

Mileage

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 80%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. Nokian WR D4 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Nokian WR D4 88%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian WR D4 99%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 59%

Price/value

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 97%

2. Nokian WR D4 79%

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

84%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Nokian WR D4 82%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 78%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Ice braking

1. Nokian WR D4 85%

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 85%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 14 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	2,1	1,9	2,2	2,6	1,5	1,6
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	1,9	2,5	3,1	2,5	2,7	2,5	2,2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,1	2,0	2,3	2,9	3,0	1,7
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	2,1	2,5	2,5	2,6	2,9	2,0	2,6
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	8,2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	8,1
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	8,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	1	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Recommended	191	57	68	40	17	3	6
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	195	65	58	40	19	6	7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 175/65 R14

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	2,0	1,8	2,4	3,2	1,5	1,6
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,6	2,8	2,5	3,5	1,5	1,8
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,6	2,7	2,4	3,8	2,0	2,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,0	2,5	3,3	2,0	1,8
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,5	1,8	2,5	3,4	3,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	35,5	27
Nokian WR D4	37,3	27,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Satisfactory	1,9	2,4	2,7	2,4	3,1	2,0	2,1
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,3	1,7	2,4	3,6	3,0	1,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	2,6	2,2	2,7	2,5	3,7	2,5	2,2
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	99,1	97,8	100	99,5
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Good	99,3	97,4	100,5	99,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: -	2+	2	2+	2-
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2	2-	2+	2-
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	36,1	25
Nokian WR D4	37,3	26,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Highly recommended	376	127	117	132	22	9
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended	387	124	121	142	21	8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: -	2,2	2,5	1,8	2,5	2,9	2,0	1,5
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2,7	2,4	2,4	2,5	3,8	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2015 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	415	144	136	144
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Highly recommended	384	135	135	114
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended	399	127	136	136
Show test details

Comparison: Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands