Segment
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Efficientgrip Cargo and the PorTran KC53 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo has B wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
