Segment
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Exemplary3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
