12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV /92%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /74%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport /37%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R21	R15 - R23	R16 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle

4. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 146

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 5x

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 29.

6. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 11.6

6. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

Year of the last test

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 2026

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Exemplary

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Good

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory

4. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended

6. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone
Roadhawk

74%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

66%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 55%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 64%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 72%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 76%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport A

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk

0%

Grass traction

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 54%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

Gravel traction

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

Handling on gravel

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 76%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 70%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

Mud traction

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 76%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 63%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

Sand traction

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 80%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 71%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

79%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

68%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Exterior noise

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 73%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

Interior noise

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 100%

2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 81%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk ?

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

80%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

64%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

6. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69%

Mileage

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 60%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Price/value

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 0%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

4. Firestone Roadhawk C

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport C

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

92%

Firestone
Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Cooper
Zeon 4XS Sport

80%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 77%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 83%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 215/60 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Offroad
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
GoodYear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands