• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

# Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
/78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
/72%
Michelin e.Primacy
/71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/88%
Michelin Primacy 5
/90%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
/59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/83%

Add to comparison

Goodyear
Hankook
Michelin
Bridgestone
Michelin
Dunlop
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R20 R13 - R23 R15 - R21 R14 - R23 R16 - R21 R14 - R17 R16 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

If you're looking for a comprehensive comparison between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4, you've come to the right place. These two tyres are summer-type, with the Hankook model a touring subtype.


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, successor of the Efficient Grip Performance model, excels in a number of tests, scoring an overall rating of 87%. Standing 4th and 18th in Vibilagare and Autobild tests respectively, its strengths include high mileage, price-value, comfort, dry and wet handling.

However, according to TyreReviews.com, the Goodyear tyre displays average aquaplaning resistance and longer dry braking time. AutoBild draws attention to its high price level.


In contrast, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, following the Ventus Prime3 K125 model, has an overall rating of 85%. Excels especially in the Autobild test where it secured the 2nd position. It shows excellent control in dry and wet conditions, including aquaplaning resistance, dry braking and handling, and wet braking. Additionally, the tyre provides lower exterior noise.


However, the drawbacks of the Hankook tyre are its average mileage and lower efficiency according to TyreReviews.com, as well as ADAC tests. Autobild's review highlights that comfort is average.


In summary, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 may impress you with its balanced performance, comfort, lower noise and good mileage, provided that you don’t mind higher prices and average aquaplaning resistance. On the other hand, Hankook Ventus Prime 4 wins in terms of handling in both wet and dry conditions, reduced exterior noise, and excellent dry and wet braking, even though its comfort and efficiency could be improved.


Looking at the mutual test positions, the Goodyear tyre triumphs in the Vibilagare and ADAC tests, whereas Hankook outperforms in the Autobild test.


Each of the tyres has its advantages and areas for improvement, so keep your specific needs and preferences in mind when making your choice between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.


As both tyre models are current, there are no replacement models to be mentioned for either.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

9

Mutual tests

Vibilagare
Name Points total
Best values in test87
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 280
Hankook Ventus Prime 477
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test1-2+2+2+
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Good
2222
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Exemplary
2+222+
Show test details
Autobild
Name
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Exemplary
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Good
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 236,429,2
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,927,7
Dunlop Sport BluResponse36,930,0
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,61,7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Satisfactory
1,6 3,2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,12,9
Show test details
Tyre Reviews
Name
Best values in test1
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Highly recommended
1
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Recommended
1
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Highly recommended
1
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Good
1,72,1
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
2,72,4
Michelin e.Primacy
Rating: Sufficient
1,3 3,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
2,42,2
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Good
2,82,6
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Exemplary
2+2+ 1+
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Exemplary
1-2+ 2+
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
1 2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 236,829,7
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,827,8
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,827,5
Show test details