Segment
2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than GoodYear (74%). The first tyre test of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 255/35 R19 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Potenza Sport were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is made in Slovenia/Germany and Potenza Sport is made in Poland/Hungary.
| # | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | 5,7 | 5,7 | 6,3 | |||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good | 8,5 | 9 | 8,4 | 7,7 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 9 | 8,9 | 9,6 | 6,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||