Segment
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium3. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium4. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium
Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 3
The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Bridgestone Potenza S001 have both proven to be competitive summer tyre models, excelling in various areas. While the GoodYear model has since been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, which we suggest you check out, both tyres still offer great performance.
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
This tyre from GoodYear showed an impressive performance in our tests, scoring an 80% rating. Produced in SI and DE, it notably excels in the areas of wet handling and price-value ratio. This is underpinned by its performance in Autobild’s tests where it garnered the 6th position out of 50 models. In ADAC's mileage tests, the tyre further demonstrated its impressive longevity, achieving a commendable 3rd place.
However, its strengths seem to revolve particularly around its wet handling abilities and the strong price to value ratio it offers. This makes it a strong candidate for those seeking a well-performing summer tyre at good value.
Bridgestone Potenza S001
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 from Bridgestone, on the other hand, did not receive our percentage rating due to insufficient data but it’s has shown solid capabilities in the tests it accomplished.
Despite the lack of specific data, it notably bagged the 3rd position in Autobild's test which is quite impressive. Furthermore, it also secured a 9th position out of 16 tyres in ADAC's test, distinguishing itself in the area of aquaplaning or more specifically cross aquaplaning.
Comparison and Conclusion
While both these models represent solid choices for a summer tyre, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outshines the Bridgestone Potenza S001 in our rating and in the mileage test.
However, those seeking a tyre with stand-out aquaplaning performance may find the Bridgestone Potenza S001 to better suit their needs. Therefore, conclusions drawn are based on individual needs and requirements. We suggest comparing various factors such as the tyre’s performance in different conditions, as well as your driving style and usual driving conditions, when making your decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary3. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended3. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB3. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
