Segment
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium3. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium
Comparison: Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended3. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended4. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended4. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
| Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
