Segment
1. Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Goodride (38%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 66% compared to 41% of the Goodride ZuperEco Z-107. The first tyre test of Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the ZuperEco Z-107 and the N Fera Primus were tested.
| # | Goodride ZuperEco Z-107
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R14 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 | 37,6 | 30,5 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
