Segment
1. Goodride SW612 Lowcost2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW612 vs. Sava TRENTA M+S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW612 and Sava TRENTA M+S, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SW612 and the TRENTA M+S were tested.
| # | Goodride SW612
| Sava TRENTA M+S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||
