Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Goodride SW612 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW612 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW612 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodride SW612 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SW612 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested.
| # | Goodride SW612
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
