Segment
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost3. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Landsail Winter Lander
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.253. Goodride SW608 31.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36.5 | 29.5 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 38.0 | 38.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40 | ||||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
