Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Goodride (6%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 63% compared to 6% of the Goodride SW608. The first tyre test of Goodride SW608 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SW608 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Goodride SW608
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.352. Goodride SW608 31.5
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40,8 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||