Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Premium2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost3. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Landsail Winter Lander vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Goodride SW608 31.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 38.0 | 38.1 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 | 35.6 | 30.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40,8 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 35,3 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
