Segment
1. Goodride SW608 Lowcost2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost3. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Landsail Winter Lander
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.773. Goodride SW608 31.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient | 3.1 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 38.0 | 38.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 38 | 29,1 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 35,3 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
