12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Goodride SW608 /6%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Giti Gitiwinter W2 /59%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R15 - R19	R16 - R22	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Goodride SW608 59

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 42

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13x

4. Goodride SW608 6x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 7.

4. Goodride SW608 11.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 28.

4. Goodride SW608 49.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77

4. Goodride SW608 31.5

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 2025

4. Goodride SW608 2025

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Good

4. Goodride SW608 ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient

4. Goodride SW608 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78.7%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

68%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

63.3%

Goodride
SW608

?

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Goodride SW608 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

80.4%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.6%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

64.5%

Goodride
SW608

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

86.3%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

66.3%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

63%

Goodride
SW608

?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74.8%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70.9%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

41.7%

Goodride
SW608

?

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Goodride SW608 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83.1%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

73%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

70.9%

Goodride
SW608

?

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Goodride SW608 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

0%

Goodride
SW608

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	1.7
Goodride SW608 Rating: Poor	2.8
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.2
Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient	3.1
Show test details