Segment
1. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Austone SP901
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Goodride winter tyres are slightly better rated (7%) than Austone (5%). In this particular case, the Goodride SW608 has a better rating of 7% compared to 5% of the Austone SP901. The first tyre test of Goodride SW608 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Austone SP901 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SW608 and the SP901 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Goodride SW608
| Austone SP901
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Austone SP901 52.
Average position in tests
2. Goodride SW608 32.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
| Austone SP901 | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Austone SP901 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40 | ||||||
| Austone SP901 | 41,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
