Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Goodride SW601 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW601 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Goodride (6%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW601 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodride SW601 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the SW601 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested.
| # | Goodride SW601
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Goodride SW601 | 38,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
