Segment
2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Premium4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle5. Goodride SU318 H/T Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SU318 H/T vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Exemplary3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodride SU318 H/T Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus ST RH06 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
