Segment
1. Goodride Sport SA-37 Lowcost2. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride Sport SA-37 vs. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Goodride summer tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Rotalla (0%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride Sport SA-37 and Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodride Sport SA-37 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Sport SA-37 and the SETULA S-PACE RU01 were tested.
| # | Goodride Sport SA-37
| Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Goodride Sport SA-37 | 174 | 73 | 101 | ||||
| Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 | 184 | 76 | 108 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
