Segment
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
Comparison: Goodride Allseason Elite Z-401 vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Goodride Allseason Elite Z-401 | 48,7 | 58,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Goodride Allseason Elite Z-401 Rating: Not recommended | 5+ | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
