Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Premium2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost3. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Landsail Winter Lander vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Sufficient2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient | 3.1 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 38.0 | 38.1 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 | 35.6 | 30.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 38 | 29,1 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 35,3 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
