Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Giti (59%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 59% of the Giti Gitiwinter W2. The first tyre test of Giti Gitiwinter W2 was done in 2021, compared to 2024 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 235/50 R19 test, where both the winter W2 and the Blizzak 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient | 3.1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Good | 2.3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.7 | 28.4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 35.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 34.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
