Segment
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.56
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||