Segment
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
| # | Giti GitiWinter W1
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Barum Polaris 5
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | R13 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 5 15.152. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.473. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.564. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended3. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||