Segment
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Giti GitiWinter W1 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 5 15.152. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.563. Debica Frigo HP2 17.334. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended3. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
